E-wallet giant rolls out restrictions as Filipinos prepare to vote on May 12
As the Philippines gears up for its midterm elections on May 12, digital wallet platform GCash has announced it will temporarily limit certain financial transactions to help prevent vote buying — a persistent challenge in the country’s electoral system.
In an official advisory posted on May 6, GCash stated that it would impose transaction limits on peer-to-peer transfers and select services in the days leading up to the polls.
“This is part of GCash’s support for clean and honest elections,” the company said. “We are implementing these measures to help prevent suspicious and potentially illegal activities related to vote buying.”
READ ALSO: What are the new features of your GCash app?
What’s changing and when
The advisory outlined specific restrictions that will be enforced beginning May 10: Users may face reduced daily transaction limits. Some peer-to-peer transfers could be delayed or flagged for verification.
Transactions involving unusually large sums may be temporarily held. While the company assured users that their money remains safe, it also emphasized that “heightened monitoring” would be in place until after the election period ends.
Vote buying: a deeply rooted problem
Vote buying — offering cash or goods in exchange for votes — has long plagued elections in the Philippines. Despite laws criminalizing the act, it remains common, particularly in local races where a few hundred votes can swing results.
In many cases, payments are discreetly made through cash handouts or via digital platforms like e-wallets. The rise of mobile payment apps in recent years has created new channels for these transactions, prompting election watchdogs and fintech firms to intervene.
The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) has welcomed efforts from private companies to monitor and restrict potentially illicit transactions.
Communication platforms and fintech firms under pressure
The move from GCash reflects growing recognition that digital platforms have a role to play in maintaining election integrity. While traditionally seen as neutral service providers, e-wallets and messaging apps are now being called upon to ensure their technologies aren’t exploited.
“It’s a smart, proactive step,” said an analyst from a Manila-based think tank. “Limiting digital cash transfers before elections might not stop vote buying completely, but it certainly makes it harder to do at scale.”
Users react with mixed feelings
While many users support the anti-vote buying stance, others expressed concerns online about the inconvenience. “I support clean elections, but I also rely on GCash for everyday expenses,” one user commented. “I just hope they don’t overdo the limits.” GCash encouraged its users to plan their transactions in advance and promised to resume normal services shortly after election day.
READ MORE FINTECH NEWS.
